Intel in more trouble than anyone knows
As device makers design from the chip out, this major player's mass-market approach faces trouble.
Nearly a decade ago I had the chance to talk with Chinese original equipment manufacturers about Intel (INTC).
Why aren't you buying its communications chips, I asked? Why are you buying chips from Broadcom (BRCM), for instance?
The answer came back clearly. Broadcom gives us designs and orders. Intel just gives us chips and an "ecosystem" of software suppliers. We can't afford to design products. We can't market them to consumers. We need complete designs from mass-market customers.
Since then, the situation has gotten much worse. Back in the previous decade, Intel was worrying about peripheral lines of business, like communications chips. Now it's losing the plot of the microprocessor market, its bread and butter.
A recent CNET story about Apple's process in creating the new iPhone is illustrative. Apple (AAPL) licensed a design from ARM Holdings (ARMH), then had its own design shop, formerly called PA Semi, push that design to its limits.
The result was a design called the A6, a proprietary product manufactured by Samsung, against which the company was competing directly both in the consumer market and in court. But we can't let business get in the way of business.
In the PC world, a product was designed around the chip. Intel dominated that market because it designed great chips and could manufacture them at low cost. In the device world, the chip is designed around the product, foundries can be rented to create a myriad of designs. Intel has no answer for this business model.
Instead, Intel has designed a new Atom processor called Clover Trail, reports Toms Hardware, which supports Windows 8 but not Linux. That's a step in the right direction, but it provides little differentiation for all the Windows OEMs out there, struggling to compete not only with Apple but with one another.
The PC era in which every machine was nearly identical is ending. The device era is one where you need to be different, and that starts at the level of the processor. Intel is the only company big enough to manufacture its own designs. What I call Moore's Second Law -- as designs get more complex, they cost exponentially more to get into production -- means Intel has won the mass market race.
But within each generation of chip-making technology there is infinite variety, and an infinite number of choices that can be made. Hardware, in short, has become software. Device makers demand the freedom to make those software choices for themselves. There's not enough room in any phone to design "around" a basic chip -- the differences have to be inside the chip or they won't fit.
Intel is betting that tablets running Windows 8 will gain a big piece of the device market, and that OEMs will compete fiercely for a growing business in a unitary space.
But that's not where things are heading. To compete with Apple, companies like Amazon (AMZN) and Samsung are taking more control over what their products do, and demanding more control over what their products are. Just as, on the retail end, that control presses software, content and after-market companies, so on the production side it presses companies that make, and think they should control, chips and what they do.
If Intel can't crack the problem I saw them facing a decade ago, it is in more trouble than anyone knows.
This article is commentary by an independent contributor, separate from TheStreet's regular news coverage. At the time of publication, Blankenhorn was long INTC but no longer knows why. He knows why he also owns AAPL.
More from TheStreet.com
hmm.... The author bases his opinion in short term. Sound investing requires looking into long term viability. My point of view: ARM architecture has limitations which are going to be shown when the applications in phones and tables require more computing power. At that time chips made with Intel X86’s Architecture will outperform ARM chips. There are two problems for Intel: 1. their chips consume more power than ARM's chips. That problem will be fixed starting with the next iteration of chips AND by adding power savings strategies within the design. 2. Intel was not able to identify the trend with phones and tablets (SoCs) early enough. Therefore they came late to the game. It takes time to design chips with great quality to meet specifications required by products for phones and tablets. BUT I have not doubt that Intel will get there. Therefore I am not count out Intel. I will continue long in INTC because I know that Intel will surface stronger. I am using the current down INTC position to stock even more INTC shares in my portfolio.
MORE ON MSN MONEY
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
Shares that have taken a beating and are most oversold won't necessarily be the first to recover.
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
Top Stocks provides analysis about the most noteworthy stocks in the market each day, combining some of the best content from around the MSN Money site and the rest of the Web.
Contributors include professional investors and journalists affiliated with MSN Money.
Follow us on Twitter @topstocksmsn.