3 writers weigh in on the search giant's sharing of user data.
Privacy advocates and many tech commentators aren't happy, especially because there's no way to opt out of the cross-Google data sharing. Does this change violate Google's "don't-be-evil" philosophy?
Yes. Google is turning evil, says Mat Honan at Gizmodo. Google claims that this change better serves its users, but really, it's all about selling more targeted ads, Honan explains. Come March 1, "things you could do in relative anonymity today will be explicitly associated with your name, your face, your phone number," and everything else you put in Google's hands. Honan is "calling this evil" because Google is violating the core promise of respecting its users -- a promise that Google used to "get us all under its feel-good tent."
C'mon. People are overreacting, says Kashmir Hill at Forbes. This "internet freakout" mostly shows that "no one actually reads privacy policies," says Hill. We have all given Google permission to share our information among Google services since 2005, explains Hill. The only change is that now Google will actually use all that stuff it knows about us to, say, recommend YouTube videos. "When Google starts bundling everything it knows about its users and selling that to insurance companies, background check companies, and the Department of Homeland Security, that's when I'll trot out the 'evil label.'" For now, "kudos to them for being so explicit" about their privacy tweaks, says Hill.
Of course Google isn't evil, says Adam Pash at Lifehacker. The real issue, he says, is Google's ambitions. "But it's never been harder to take their famous 'Don't be evil' motto seriously." Google started out wanting to give us the web, then getting out of the way. Now it "wants to grab every piece of the internet you use," trying for "world domination" like Facebook or, more damningly, 1990s-era AOL, Pash explains. That's not the Google we came to love, and it's "a fantastic bummer" for anyone who likes a free, innovative web, says Pash.
More from The Week:
Probably making it easier for them to track down anonymous members.
It's a shame, it used to be such a nice alternative to MSN, Yahoo and those other large corporations that step on the little guy. Guess the days of looking after your audiences best interest is gone!
MORE ON MSN MONEY
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
The photo-sharing site only has 10 employees, and it may be up for grabs.
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
Top Stocks provides analysis about the most noteworthy stocks in the market each day, combining some of the best content from around the MSN Money site and the rest of the Web.
Contributors include professional investors and journalists affiliated with MSN Money.
Follow us on Twitter @topstocksmsn.