Just goes to show you -- you can never predict what, in the short term, the market will latch onto.
Friday, Wells Fargo
) and JPMorgan
) reported third-quarter earnings before the market opened. I was expecting that the two stocks might deliver a positive surprise that might be enough to start a rally in the still-depressed financial sector.
Well, sort of.
Wells Fargo did report a slight surprise on earnings of 88 cents a share (versus expectations for 87 cents) for the quarter. That was a 22% increase from the third quarter of 2011. Revenue, however, rose just 8% year over year to a slightly disappointing $21.2 billion (versus expectations of $21.42 billion.)
For those investors with a slightly more long-term approach than just the recent quarter, the news was solidly good. The bank continues to take share in the U.S. mortgage market, where Wells Fargo accounted for one in three U.S. mortgages at the end of June. Mortgage banking revenue climbed by 50% to $2.8 billion from the third quarter of 2011.
And the bank showed a big increase in deposits with core checking and savings deposits up $16.9 billion from the second quarter. Growing deposits give the bank more money on lend and provide what is currently a very low cost source of funds.
That, eventually, will work to Wells Fargo’s benefit -- but Friday that longer-term good news is part of what has depressed the stock’s price. Loan demand remains soft, with loans at Wells Fargo climbing just 1% year to year. That means cash is flowing in, but loan demand isn’t strong enough to put that money to work at relatively higher rates -- which resulted in a 0.25 percentage point decline in net interest margin to 3.66% from 3.91% at the end of the second quarter.
Wall Street never likes to see a decline in the difference between what a bank makes on loans and what it pays for funds -- even if in the long-term increased deposits make Wells Fargo a stronger bank. It also certainly didn’t help that this week the U.S. government brought charges of fraud against Wells Fargo, claiming that over the last decade the bank made reckless mortgages that resulted in hundreds of millions in losses by the insurance program run by the Federal Housing Administration. Citigroup
) and Deutsche Bank
) settled similar charges for $158 million and $202 million, respectively.
Shares of Wells Fargo closed Friday down 2.64%.
It looks like traders have used a similar drop in net interest margin at JPMorgan Chase as a reason to take profits there too after the bank announced record earnings. Shares closed down 1.1% Friday.
Before the market opened, JPMorgan reported record net income of $5.71 billion, an increase of 34%. Earnings of $1.40 a share -- up from $1.02 in the third quarter of 2011 -- crushed the consensus analyst estimate of $1.20 a share. Revenue climbed 6% year over year to $25.9 billion.
Not all of the bank’s units clicked in the quarter. Revenue at the investment-banking unit fell 1%. Trading revenue was essentially flat. And the credit portfolio, which includes the remainder of the disastrous London Whale trade, produced just $90 million in revenue, down from $578 million in the third quarter of 2011.
As at Wells Fargo -- and I suspect at other banks yet to report-- mortgage lending was the brightest spot in the quarter. Mortgage fees and related revenue rose to $2.38 billion from $1.38 billion in the third quarter of 2011. About 75% of mortgage volume in the quarter came from refinancings.
Credit quality continued to improve with credit card loans overdue by 30 days falling to 2.15% of loans outstanding from 2.9% in the third quarter of 2011. Write-offs dropped to 3.57% from 4.7% in the third quarter of 2011 and 4.35% in the second quarter.
Traders, though, seem to have focused on a decline in net interest margin as a reason for selling. This measure of the difference between what a bank charges for its loans and what it pays to raise money to lend dropped to 2.43% in the quarter from 2.66% in the third quarter of 2011.
At the time of this writing, Jim Jubak didn't own shares of any companies mentioned in this post in personal portfolios. The mutual fund he manages, Jubak Global Equity Fund (JUBAX), may or may not own positions in any stock mentioned. The fund did not own shares of any stock mentioned in this post as of the end of June. For a full list of the stocks in the fund as of the end of the most recent quarter, see the fund's portfolio here.