Banks focus on security after recent hacks
This business runs on trust. If institutions lose it, they lose customers.

Imagine a situation in which you have to make a payment but you can't find your wallet. Thousands of people found themselves in a similar state late last week when they lost access to their banks' websites while trying to pay bills. The attackers flooded the websites with millions of requests to load pages, forcing the banks' infrastructures to process more information than they were designed to handle. As a result, the systems turned nonresponsive and customers could not access the websites and hence their own accounts.
And the timing of the attacks -- right at the end of the month -- made things worse for many customers as utility and services bills came due. While the source of this disruption continues to be investigated, one conclusion is obvious: The banks have to shore up their security.
Thankfully, the banks' systems were robust enough to thwart any attempts to access confidential customer data, including account details or access information. The temporary loss of connectivity seems to have been the only result.
Could this happen again? Unfortunately, yes, which is what has set the banks into action. Although the recent attack did not do much damage, it did expose some serious vulnerabilities in the banks' systems -- which might be exploited with more serious consequences if they are not addressed as the highest priority.
Banks spend millions of dollars each year in the upkeep of their IT infrastructure and boast of some of the most sophisticated computer defenses available. For example, Wells Fargo's IT expenses are likely around $1 to $2 billion a year, considering that equipment and staff costs about 2% to 4% of its total annual expenses. But the fact that the attack was successful in taking down the systems only means that more needs to be done.

What if a future attack compromises customers' confidential information? Banks fear that possibility more than their customers do, as banks are responsible for ensuring confidentiality besides safeguarding money. So if a bank's security is circumvented, the bank becomes liable to compensate customers for the breach. After all, the banking business runs on trust, and if a bank loses trust, it loses customers.
MORE ON MSN MONEY
DATA PROVIDERS
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
LATEST POSTS
The outspoken hedge fund manager has left Twitter.
FIDELITY VIEWPOINTS
- How to sell covered calls - Fidelity Investments
- Savvy year-end tax moves to consider now - Fidelity Investments
- Seven ways to prepare for tax changes
- Five reasons an annual review is crucial - Fidelity Investments
- Take a look at mid caps now - Fidelity Investments
- State of the sector: Health care - Fidelity Investments
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
ABOUT
Top Stocks provides analysis about the most noteworthy stocks in the market each day, combining some of the best content from around the MSN Money site and the rest of the Web.
Contributors include professional investors and journalists affiliated with MSN Money.
Follow us on Twitter @topstocksmsn.

