Mixed reviews for Amazon's newest Kindle

It's no iPad, say those who have used the device. But even with its limited functions, the Kindle's price is the star feature.

By Kim Peterson Nov 14, 2011 5:06PM
Amazon (AMZN) is finally giving some reviewers a look at its highly-anticipated Kindle Fire, the low-priced tablet all but guaranteed to be a hot holiday seller.

The reviews are perhaps not as glowing as Amazon would like. Critics hit hard on some hardware choices, like no button for controlling volume, but praised the Fire's display and navigation. The device goes on sale this week for $199.

Many reviewers agree that the Fire nicely accomplishes its main mission: Delivering the movies, newspapers and books purchased from Amazon's website. It doesn't have a camera, microphone, Bluetooth or other advanced features that Apple's (AAPL) iPad has.

"Most problematic, though, the Fire does not have anything like the polish or speed of an iPad," writes David Pogue of The New York Times. "You feel that $200 price tag with every swipe of your finger."

Pogue also laments the Fire's sluggish animations and unresponsiveness. The Fire needs a little work, he adds, and its software bugs could drive you nuts if you're used to an iPad.

Consumer Reports was more positive on the device, particularly when it's paired with Amazon's $79-a-year Prime service that offers streaming videos for no additional charge.

"In our first look, the Amazon Kindle Fire was a fine performer, especially if your priority is to get Amazon content including movies, TV shows, music, and books," writes Donna Tapellini. "The display is smaller than the iPad’s, and the app market is more limited, but for $200 you’re getting a full-featured tablet that performs well."

Influential technology site Engadget says the Fire is perfectly useable with a good-looking display. But the device simply can't compete with other tablets, writes Tim Stevens.

"Its performance is a occasionally sluggish, its interface often clunky, its storage too slight, its functionality a bit restricted and its 7-inch screen too limiting if you were hoping to convert all your paper magazine subscriptions into the digital ones," Stevens adds. "Other, bigger tablets do it better -- usually at two or three times the cost."

Wired.com was also critical of the Fire, saying the screen is too small and the processor isn't powerful enough. Jon Phillips calls the Fire "a fiendishly effective shopping portal in the guise of a 7-inch slate."

The magazine reading experience isn't comfortable enough, Phillips adds, but the video streaming and playing capabilities are the Fire's best features.

"If you already have $200 in your high-tech hardware slush fund, and you’re not willing to splurge one cent more, I suggest you wait longer before pulling the trigger on a tablet," Phillips writes. "Let that nest egg build. Let it grow interest. Wait for the Kindle Fire 2. Or -- yes, I’m going to go there -- consider an iPad."

But CNet cheered the Fire, calling it "an outstanding entertainment value that prizes simplicity over techno-wizardry."

The Fire "is not the best tablet I've seen this year, but I have to give credit to Amazon for seeing something that no other manufacturer -- not even Apple -- was able to grasp," writes Donald Bell. "When you look at the gap between what tablets are capable of doing, and what people actually use them for, you'll find that most people just want to be entertained."




Tags: AAPLAMZN
3Comments
Nov 14, 2011 11:45PM
avatar
msbiztoo, I see your comment was well received.  lol.
Nov 14, 2011 11:17PM
avatar
Motto of the story...... for the most part, you get what you pay for.  This is basically a device that allows you to consume Amazon content.  It's not a whole lot more than that.  With that in mind, you shouldn't expect to pay a lot for it. 
Nov 14, 2011 5:23PM
avatar
ONLY an iPad is an iPad...anything else and it's junk!
Report
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of Conductplease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
Categories
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?

DATA PROVIDERS

Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.

Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.

STOCK SCOUTER

StockScouter rates stocks from 1 to 10, with 10 being the best, using a system of advanced mathematics to determine a stock's expected risk and return. Ratings are displayed on a bell curve, meaning there will be fewer ratings of 1 and 10 and far more of 4 through 7.

116
116 rated 1
284
284 rated 2
461
461 rated 3
671
671 rated 4
628
628 rated 5
618
618 rated 6
615
615 rated 7
495
495 rated 8
347
347 rated 9
115
115 rated 10
12345678910

Top Picks

SYMBOLNAMERATING
DYNDYNEGY Inc10
TAT&T Inc9
VZVERIZON COMMUNICATIONS9
EXCEXELON CORPORATION8
AAPLAPPLE Inc10
More

VIDEO ON MSN MONEY

ABOUT

Top Stocks provides analysis about the most noteworthy stocks in the market each day, combining some of the best content from around the MSN Money site and the rest of the Web.

Contributors include professional investors and journalists affiliated with MSN Money.

Follow us on Twitter @topstocksmsn.