Why Sears should sell Lands' End
The company has done nothing with the specialty retailer it bought in 2002.
It's about time. The bizarre marriage made no sense when Sears bought Lands' End in 2002 for $1.86 billion. The fact that Sears wants to sell it a decade later for about the same price -- and bankers think the actual price will be far less -- shows how little Sears brought to the brand.
Sears shares fell more than 2% Thursday afternoon to $67.55.
Lands' End grew quickly in the 1990s as a respected brand of high-quality, classically American clothes. Customers were loyal to its Oxford shirts and khaki pants. Former Sears CEO Alan Lacy took a big gamble on Lands' End, hoping its clothes could play a key part in the company's turnaround.
What happened? Sears tried to sprinkle Lands' End items around its otherwise forgettable collection of clothing, wrote Paul Miller at Retail Online Integration in 2007. He described it as the new "Lands' End ghetto" in Sears' stores. Sears tried to improve the situation, but the end result was the same: Lands' End languished under its new owner.
Now, Sears chairman Eddie Lampert is hoping to find a buyer that will license Lands' End to Sears while expanding the brand in other areas.
But can Lands' End recover? The Post cites the example of Martha Stewart's line, which managed to make a comeback at Macy's (M) after slumming in Kmart stores. Lands' End is still a well-known name for many Americans. Perhaps it isn't too late.
As for Sears, the move is another sign that the company is shifting away from clothing and focusing more on housewares, tools and appliances. Sears is already pulling clothing out of some stores, perhaps in a test run for a chain-wide overhaul. The company is becoming a smaller, niche retailer, realizing it cannot be the store for everyone it was in the past.
Sears is closing as many as 182 stores in an effort to save money. Here's a list of 79 of those locations.
More from Top Stocks
The only thing Sears brought to Lands End was the increase in sales and free shipping which wasn't a bad thing. as a customer for many years, I've seen and felt their products go from good, to bad to ugly, and back to good. I think they're paying more attention to quality and product form and function. lets hope they get sold
MORE ON MSN MONEY
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
John Stumpf acknowledges that growth has been slow, but he says he's still optimistic.
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
Top Stocks provides analysis about the most noteworthy stocks in the market each day, combining some of the best content from around the MSN Money site and the rest of the Web.
Contributors include professional investors and journalists affiliated with MSN Money.
Follow us on Twitter @topstocksmsn.