Hostess may be gone, but Twinkies may live on
The baking company's demise has been a long time coming.
Hostess Brands, which Friday announced it was going out of business, was touted a few years ago as an example of a successful corporate turnaround story. The company, which has been a train wreck for years, does have some valuable brands that may be of interest to other companies. In other words, don't write the obituary for the Twinkies just yet.
Groupo Bimbo SAB, the world's largest bread baker, might be interested in acquiring some if not all of Hostess's assets, which include creme-filled sponge cake and other Hostess products such as Sno-balls and Ding-Dongs. Though most people might not be familiar with the Mexican company, they are no doubt familiar with its brands, which include Entenmanns's baked goods, Stroehman bread and Thomas' English muffins. David Marguiles, a spokesman for the company, refused to comment about Hostess.
Flowers Foods (FLO), the U.S.'s second largest producer and marketer of packaged baked goods, could be another potential Twinkies home. The Thomassville, Georgia company acquired Tasty Baking, a Philadelphia snack food company with a similar product line-up to Hostess, for $165 million in 2011, CBS reported. Its other brands include Blue Bird and Mrs. Freshley's snack foods along with Sunbeam bread. The company declined to discuss its potential interest in Hostess.
"It is not our place to talk about any other company's business," according to Flowers. "However, this is an unfortunate situation and we are very sad for all those impacted. We are staying focused on making sure our consumers and customers have the baked foods they need -- and on serving the market."
Hostess's demise was a long time coming, DealBook reported. The company has filed for bankruptcy protection twice in the last few years, most recently in January. Unprofitable Hostess had planned to lower expenses by reducing labor costs. The offer to the unions included wage, benefit and work rule concessions but also gave them a 25% ownership stake in the company, representation on its Board of Directors and $100 million in reorganized Hostess Brands' debt.
Its unionized workers, represented by the Bakery, Confectionery, Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers Union, cried foul and began a work stoppage. Hostess gave union members until 5 p.m. Thursday to return to work. The deadline was ignored because the company was asking for too much in the way of concessions, according to the union.
"The Wall Street investors who took over the company after the last bankruptcy attempted to resolve the mess by attacking the company's most valuable asset -- its workers," said Union President Frank Hurt in a statement. "They sought to force the workers, who had already taken significant wage and benefit cuts, to absorb even greater cuts including the loss of their pension contributions."
Hostess CEO Gregory F. Rayburn said in a statement, "We deeply regret the necessity of today's decision, but we do not have the financial resources to weather an extended nationwide strike."
With the liquidation of Hostess, 18,000 workers lost their jobs. Even if buyers acquire the company's assets and brands, there is no telling how many would be hired back by the new owners.
Jonathan Berr does not own shares of the listed stocks. Follow him on Twitter@jdberr
SOUNDS LIKE THE UNION REILLY WORKED FOR HARD TO PROTECT THE WORKERS RIGHTS,I WONDER IF IT REILLY MATTERS TO THE UNION THAT 18000 PEOPLE JUST LOST THEIR JOBS.
Step 1 to Communisum - build a unionized country
Step 2 to Communisum - demonize the job creators
Step 3 to Communisum - allow government to federalize the banks and businesses
Step 4 to Communisum - disarm the general population
Step 5 to Communisum - destroy the will of the people by removing their hopes/dreams and freedoms
Guess what people we are at step 5
Here is my other big problem with unions. I understand why they existed way, way back in the day but not anymore. It is too easy to move and transportation is relatively cheap. I'm not happy with my pay, benefits, working conditions, whatever. Option 1, I could quit and go find better. Option 2, I could go on strike which is just legal extortion as far as I am concerned. Why do union members go for Option 2? Because most of them know they can't find better. They know they are already very well compensated but they just fight for more and more. Now a lot of pro union people will deny that but it is the truth. If there is better options, why not go there? If the alternatives aren't better, why are you going on strike for more? Pure greed by everyone involved. I feel bad for the innocent people involved including those in the teamster union that negotiated in good faith and accepted tough concessions knowing the alternative was worse. If it wasn't for the fact I know you will now be collecting unemployment for your stupidity, I would be happy you were kicked to the curb today. Of course, maybe that was your plan. Unemployment checks better than actually working???
So now when the zombies show up I won't be able to be to get a gd Twinkie? Might as well end it now.
Well I would like to Thank the Bakers Union for doing this to all IBC workers. I hope you can sleep at night and find a job right away. All this striking was so uncalled for and You but your fellow members out of jobs. Nice going.
MORE ON MSN MONEY
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Quotes are real-time for NASDAQ, NYSE and AMEX. See delay times for other exchanges.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Thomson Reuters (click for restrictions). Real-time quotes provided by BATS Exchange. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Interactive Data Real-Time Services. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by SIX Financial Information.
All hail the bull market, which ended the week with a big rally. But it also is starting to look a little like 1987, which suffered an epic blow-out.
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
Top Stocks provides analysis about the most noteworthy stocks in the market each day, combining some of the best content from around the MSN Money site and the rest of the Web.
Contributors include professional investors and journalists affiliated with MSN Money.
Follow us on Twitter @topstocksmsn.