Hostess may be gone, but Twinkies may live on
The baking company's demise has been a long time coming.
Hostess Brands, which Friday announced it was going out of business, was touted a few years ago as an example of a successful corporate turnaround story. The company, which has been a train wreck for years, does have some valuable brands that may be of interest to other companies. In other words, don't write the obituary for the Twinkies just yet.
Groupo Bimbo SAB, the world's largest bread baker, might be interested in acquiring some if not all of Hostess's assets, which include creme-filled sponge cake and other Hostess products such as Sno-balls and Ding-Dongs. Though most people might not be familiar with the Mexican company, they are no doubt familiar with its brands, which include Entenmanns's baked goods, Stroehman bread and Thomas' English muffins. David Marguiles, a spokesman for the company, refused to comment about Hostess.
Flowers Foods (FLO), the U.S.'s second largest producer and marketer of packaged baked goods, could be another potential Twinkies home. The Thomassville, Georgia company acquired Tasty Baking, a Philadelphia snack food company with a similar product line-up to Hostess, for $165 million in 2011, CBS reported. Its other brands include Blue Bird and Mrs. Freshley's snack foods along with Sunbeam bread. The company declined to discuss its potential interest in Hostess.
"It is not our place to talk about any other company's business," according to Flowers. "However, this is an unfortunate situation and we are very sad for all those impacted. We are staying focused on making sure our consumers and customers have the baked foods they need -- and on serving the market."
Hostess's demise was a long time coming, DealBook reported. The company has filed for bankruptcy protection twice in the last few years, most recently in January. Unprofitable Hostess had planned to lower expenses by reducing labor costs. The offer to the unions included wage, benefit and work rule concessions but also gave them a 25% ownership stake in the company, representation on its Board of Directors and $100 million in reorganized Hostess Brands' debt.
Its unionized workers, represented by the Bakery, Confectionery, Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers Union, cried foul and began a work stoppage. Hostess gave union members until 5 p.m. Thursday to return to work. The deadline was ignored because the company was asking for too much in the way of concessions, according to the union.
"The Wall Street investors who took over the company after the last bankruptcy attempted to resolve the mess by attacking the company's most valuable asset -- its workers," said Union President Frank Hurt in a statement. "They sought to force the workers, who had already taken significant wage and benefit cuts, to absorb even greater cuts including the loss of their pension contributions."
Hostess CEO Gregory F. Rayburn said in a statement, "We deeply regret the necessity of today's decision, but we do not have the financial resources to weather an extended nationwide strike."
With the liquidation of Hostess, 18,000 workers lost their jobs. Even if buyers acquire the company's assets and brands, there is no telling how many would be hired back by the new owners.
Jonathan Berr does not own shares of the listed stocks. Follow him on Twitter@jdberr
So I read an interview with one of the people on strike and they asked why they didn't end the strike knowing what would happen. His answer was because the company had been mismanaged for years and he was at his wits end. Ok so I completely understand that BUT here is a thought, quit!!! What good does going on strike do you? Why bring down a company and 18,499 co-workers because you are unhappy? Go ahead and hate management all you want but do you hate your co-workers that much? Do you not understand those co-workers have families to take care of and bills to pay? I don't care how bad management is. You can quit if it is that bad. There is no reason to be so selfish and throw your co-workers that are willing to work there under the bus.
This is my problem with unions. The "leaders" of the union do everything they can to make sure the employees don't trust and hate management whether they deserve it or not. Afterall, if you trust management, you don't need a union. They have no problem with people going on strike because they get paid all the same. Now that Hostess is gone, they still have jobs and the union lives on but not for the rank and file. They don't feel the hurt when their membership hurts.
Way to go Hostess! It's about time businesses rein in the greedy Unions stifling the economy!
"We deeply regret the necessity of today's decision, but we do not have the financial resources to weather an extended nationwide strike," Chief Executive Gregory Rayburn said in a statement. "Hostess Brands will move promptly to lay off most of its 18,500-member workforce and focus on selling its assets to the highest bidders."
The company said it will continue to ship out its well-known products until inventory runs out.
The national strike by members of the Bakery, Confectionary, Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers International Union (BCTGM) that began last week decimated the 82-year-old company’s ability to produce and deliver products at roughly 12 of its 33 plants. The company announced earlier in the week that the ax would fall on Friday if the strikers didn’t get back to work, but the union didn’t blink.
So, someone please explain; how did the Union help the 18,000 workers? They've paid union dues forever and now they have NO JOBS.
Here is my other big problem with unions. I understand why they existed way, way back in the day but not anymore. It is too easy to move and transportation is relatively cheap. I'm not happy with my pay, benefits, working conditions, whatever. Option 1, I could quit and go find better. Option 2, I could go on strike which is just legal extortion as far as I am concerned. Why do union members go for Option 2? Because most of them know they can't find better. They know they are already very well compensated but they just fight for more and more. Now a lot of pro union people will deny that but it is the truth. If there is better options, why not go there? If the alternatives aren't better, why are you going on strike for more? Pure greed by everyone involved. I feel bad for the innocent people involved including those in the teamster union that negotiated in good faith and accepted tough concessions knowing the alternative was worse. If it wasn't for the fact I know you will now be collecting unemployment for your stupidity, I would be happy you were kicked to the curb today. Of course, maybe that was your plan. Unemployment checks better than actually working???
Step 1 to Communisum - build a unionized country
Step 2 to Communisum - demonize the job creators
Step 3 to Communisum - allow government to federalize the banks and businesses
Step 4 to Communisum - disarm the general population
Step 5 to Communisum - destroy the will of the people by removing their hopes/dreams and freedoms
Guess what people we are at step 5
"In early February, Hostess had asked the bankruptcy judge to approve a sweet new employment deal for Driscoll. Its terms guaranteed him a base annual salary of $1.5 million, plus cash incentives and "long-term incentive" compensation of up to $2 million. If Hostess liquidated or Driscoll were fired without cause, he'd still get severance pay of $1.95 million as long as he honored a noncompete agreement."
- Source, Fortune
"In March 2012, Brian Driscoll resigned from his position as CEO. Gregory Rayburn, who had been hired and named Chief Restructuring Officer only nine days earlier, assumed the leadership position. "Fortune" reported that unions within the organization had been unhappy with Driscoll's proposed compensation package of $1.5 million, plus cash incentives and a $1.95 million "long term compensation" package. Additionally, the court had discovered that Hostess executives had received raises of up to 80% the year prior. In an effort to restore relations, Rayburn cut the salaries of the four top Hostess executives to $1, to be restored on January 1 the following year. "
- Source - Wikipedia,
MORE ON MSN MONEY
DATA PROVIDERS
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Quotes are real-time for NASDAQ, NYSE and AMEX. See delay times for other exchanges.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Thomson Reuters (click for restrictions). Real-time quotes provided by BATS Exchange. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Interactive Data Real-Time Services. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by SIX Financial Information.
Japanese stock price data provided by Nomura Research Institute Ltd.; quotes delayed 20 minutes. Canadian fund data provided by CANNEX Financial Exchanges Ltd.
LATEST POSTS
The auto parts giant beats Wall Street expectations, while continuing to expand its stores in the U.S. and Mexico.
FIDELITY VIEWPOINTS
- How to sell covered calls - Fidelity Investments
- Savvy year-end tax moves to consider now - Fidelity Investments
- Seven ways to prepare for tax changes
- Five reasons an annual review is crucial - Fidelity Investments
- Take a look at mid caps now - Fidelity Investments
- State of the sector: Health care - Fidelity Investments
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
ABOUT
Top Stocks provides analysis about the most noteworthy stocks in the market each day, combining some of the best content from around the MSN Money site and the rest of the Web.
Contributors include professional investors and journalists affiliated with MSN Money.
Follow us on Twitter @topstocksmsn.

