Someone finally defends the Facebook IPO

The CEO of Morgan Stanley sits down with CNBC to discuss what happened.

By Kim Peterson May 31, 2012 5:23PM
The Facebook (FB) IPO has been a disaster, and the company has largely been silent about the whole thing. We haven't seen much from CEO Mark Zuckerberg or any other executives since shares spiraled after their May 18 debut.

But one of the deal's creators, Morgan Stanley CEO James Gorman, went on national television Thursday to talk about the infamous offering. Morgan Stanley was the deal's chief underwriter, and Gorman defended his company's role and says his team acted appropriately.

Post continues below.
Did the company and its underwriters really need to price Facebook at $38 a share? That price has not held up in the market -- Facebook fell sharply in the days after its debut and closed Thursday at $29.60.

Gorman said that heading into the IPO, there was tremendous hype and excitement about the stock. He's right. CNBC and just about every financial news site quoted analysts and other observers who were excited about the deal. The Facebook IPO was supposed to be what brought individual retail investors back to the market.

"We had people calling in from every part of the country and internationally wanting in on this deal," he told host Maria Bartiromo in a CNBC interview. "So that demand was there at a level that we frankly hadn't seen I don't know ever." 

But investors were disappointed after a volatile first day that saw the stock close near its $38 IPO price. And that disappointment continued as the stock price continued to plummet.

Then word got out that analysts at Morgan Stanley and other underwriters lowered their estimates on Facebook's prospects shortly before the IPO. News of the lowered estimates went to large institutional investors -- but smaller retail investors had no clue.

Gorman said this is standard procedure on Wall Street.

"There is individual disclosure -- oral disclosure, no written reports -- to institutional investors interested in what that particular analyst says because they can go to many of the companies and pick up, obviously, input from a number of the different underwriters," Gorman said. "And that policy to date has not been offer that same information, either the original projection or the revised, to retail investors."

He added that this all took place during the roadshow period -- the time before the IPO when Facebook executives meet with large investors to answer questions. The demand for the stock was still there at that point, he said.

"There was no nefarious activity," he said. "This was standard operating procedure. It's the policy we and all the underwriters operated under with retail organizations. There wasn't any desire to obfuscate or hide."

Investors are suing Facebook, Morgan Stanley and other underwriters in federal court, alleging the companies didn't disclose the estimate changes to everyone.

Gorman said he was confident his team followed the correct procedures and did the job an underwriter is supposed to do. He repeatedly said that Facebook is just at the start of a long journey.

And he had a message for the people who were disappointed that a share of Facebook didn't turn into a winning lottery ticket: "The group of people who thought they were buying this stock so they could get an enormous pop were both naive and bought it under the wrong pretenses."

More from Top Stocks


3Comments
May 31, 2012 6:13PM
avatar

What is wrong with the SEC. FaceBook may have more advertisers in the future so it can sell its stock at overly inflated prices like a thousand to 1 that is for every thousand dollars in stock it has for a penny in profit ten years from now.

 

Well save some money for PorkButt.  Everybody in the world has heard of PorkButt.  I value it at 30 billion dollars.  Thats twenty five dollars a share.  It has no advertisers now, but it will have some in the future.

Pretty enticing investment.

Jun 1, 2012 8:32AM
avatar

So here we have a Wall Street CEO telling the investor public to focus on what Facebook will be next year, and still not willing to put a price on that. Meanwhile, everyone on Wall Street, especially traders, thinks of the long term as 90 days. So funny. So hypocritical. Not funny.

Jun 1, 2012 8:22AM
avatar

It kind of makes you wonder, doesn’t it? Just what kind of financial disaster it would take for someone on Wall Street to ever admit they were wrong? I’m not sure I want to find out. It’s so easy to be perfect when you accept failure as the norm. No wonder they can justify paying themselves huge bonuses. Salesmen and story tellers. That's 99% of Wall Street.

Report
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of Conductplease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
Categories
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?

DATA PROVIDERS

Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.

Quotes are real-time for NASDAQ, NYSE and AMEX. See delay times for other exchanges.

Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Thomson Reuters (click for restrictions). Real-time quotes provided by BATS Exchange. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Interactive Data Real-Time Services. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by SIX Financial Information.

Japanese stock price data provided by Nomura Research Institute Ltd.; quotes delayed 20 minutes. Canadian fund data provided by CANNEX Financial Exchanges Ltd.

STOCK SCOUTER

StockScouter rates stocks from 1 to 10, with 10 being the best, using a system of advanced mathematics to determine a stock's expected risk and return. Ratings are displayed on a bell curve, meaning there will be fewer ratings of 1 and 10 and far more of 4 through 7.

126
126 rated 1
257
257 rated 2
459
459 rated 3
599
599 rated 4
671
671 rated 5
682
682 rated 6
603
603 rated 7
455
455 rated 8
269
269 rated 9
113
113 rated 10
12345678910

Top Picks

SYMBOLNAMERATING
ABTAbbott Laboratories10
AIGAmerican International Group Inc10
ATVIActivision Blizzard Inc10
CACA Inc10
CSCOCisco Systems Inc10
More
Fidelity Brokerage Services, Member NYSE, SIPC. (c) 2011 FMR LLC. All rights reserved

VIDEO ON MSN MONEY

ABOUT

Top Stocks provides analysis about the most noteworthy stocks in the market each day, combining some of the best content from around the MSN Money site and the rest of the Web.

Contributors include professional investors and journalists affiliated with MSN Money.

Follow us on Twitter @topstocksmsn.