Facebook IPO filing due next week
The company may seek to raise as much as $10 billion, The Wall Street Journal says, with a market cap of $75 billion to $100 billion. That would make the company more valuable than Amazon.com.
Facebook, the colossus of social networking, is expected to file papers for an initial public offering next week.
The indications are that the IPO will suggest the company is worth $75 billion to $100 billion, The Wall Street Journal said.
Facebook's IPO could raise as much as $10 billion, the Journal said. The offering has been hotly anticipated as a defining moment for the latest Web investing boom.
Facebook, based in Menlo Park, Calif., has more than 800 million members around the world and has dramatically changed the way people interact with each other and share information on the Internet.
While $10 billion is the expected size of the offering, even a $5 billion offering would be the largest for an Internet company. It would dwarf the size of Google's (GOOG) 2004 IPO, which raised raised $1.7 billion.
Article continues below.
The biggest technology IPO was $5.9 billion for Infineon Technologies (IFFNY), the semiconductor maker that was spun off by then-parent Siemens (SI).
Facebook's valuation may be lower than guesses this summer that had put the overall value of Facebook at more than $100 billion. But disappointing IPOs from Groupon (GRPN) and Zynga (ZYNG) have tempered Wall Street's exuberance.
But it would still rank the company among the most valuable in the world. At $75 billion, the company would be the world's 75th-most-valuable company. The market capitalization would exceed those of Caterpillar (CAT), United Parcel Service (UPS) and Walt Disney (DIS).
A $100 billion valuation would rank the company ahead of McDonald's (MCD), Anheuser-Busch/Inbev(BUD), Citigroup (C) and ConocoPhillips (COP). It would even be worth more than Amazon.com (AMZN), which has a market capitalization of about $88 billion.
Google now has a market cap of $188 billion.
Not bad for a company that didn't exist until 2004.
Facebook was founded by Mark Zuckerberg with his Harvard roommates Eduardo Saverin, Dustin Moskovitz and Chris Hughes.
The name comes from the colloquial name for the book given to students at the start of the academic year by many U.S. colleges to help students get to know each other. Facebook allows any users who declare themselves to be at least 13 years old to register on the site.
The IPO was expected this year in part because the number of the privately held company's shareholders exceeds limits that permit it to remain private under U.S. securities laws.
The offering is expected to make hundreds of Facebook employees instant millionaires and may set off a frenzy of buying of real estate and upscale toys in the San Francisco Bay Area. It will make millions for the venture capitalists who funded the company in its early days, including Accel Partners, Greylock Partners and Meritech Capital Partners, the Journal said.
But the filing would also allow analysts and investors their first look at the company's finances. Its 2011 revenue was projected at $4.27 billion by EMarketer in September. That would represent a doubling of revenue from a year earlier.
A side story to the IPO is what investment bank will get the coveted lead position in managing the offer.
The Journal suggested that Morgan Stanley (MS) will be the winner. But Goldman Sachs (GS) may be the co-lead manager.
Morgan Stanley was up 40 cents to $18.55 today. Goldman Sachs rose $3.22 to $111.78.
Managing a big IPO means millions of dollars in fees for the investment banks. And millions more in accounting and legal fees.
What's not known is if those estimates are accurate. Nor does anyone know how profitable the company is. Other questions include how fast its user base is growing and other measures.
Facebook is a joke. People who use facebook need to get out and get a life.
Google and Amazon will always be useful. Facebook will eventually die out the way Myspace did. They're going to be set for life though so it doesn't really matter...LOL
fbh8ter, I'm one too. I thought it was cool for about a month, catching up with old acquaintances and seeing what they're up to without having to attend a high school reunion, for example. Then I got bored. They were acquaintances for a reason. I don't need to know that they "Ate Frankenberries for dinner. Yay!" and that Stephanie "luv[s] Frankenberries." I haven't heard from or even thought about them for many, many years.
FB doesn't produce anything. Okay, it gets paid for advertising so we can all buy more and increase our consumer debt. Cripes I sound old and crotchedy. Look what you've made me become Facebook!
I would not be buying facebook as far as a investment perspective, and here is why. Although, it may be the dominant force in social media, how much larger do you really expect facebook to get? Most people that will use facebook at one point in their life already have profiles. So if it stays around as a dominant force in the social media world there is very little room for growth unless it is able to successfully branch out into other areas which I haven't seen it do yet.
Secondly, there is plenty of competition, and some of the other social sites like myspace were extremely popular and wound up being duds. Privacy and the whole sharing your status's or information with others has gotten a lot of attention lately and people have begun to not post as much stuff like that on their profiles as before which made the site exciting to begin with, and with people turning their profiles off to be searched, new users won't find someone they would like to reconnect with. With mobile devices being so popular now, if you wanted to get a status update from someone now, you don't have to log into facebook, you can just shoot them a text, or email, and get a response immediately, because who wants to see your conversation with someone on someones wall where everyone can read it?
I think facebook is a great tool for sharing photos and staying in touch with people, but I also think it is limited, and from an investment standpoint, I can not see it being worth $100 billion dollars, that's worth more than big banks like CitiGroup, or Bank of America, to state that facebook is as worth as much as companies like that is absurd, one earns a few cents per click of an ad while the other earns money from the loans for your cars and cars that you pay monthly.
Facebook may be around for a while, but those numbers do not justify it's market value, and I think make for a bad investment. Initially it may jump because everyone will be buying it, but eventually it will drop in value. Also this is a company that can be replaced by something very easily just like it replaced myspace, since it's a free service, people would be willing to make the change for the next big thing.
I agree with dam tired. Zuckerberg is trying to hit it big before Facebook tanks. Once the decline starts, it will be steep.
MORE ON MSN MONEY
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
The Fed may start tapering in just a few months. Here are a few of the likely winners and losers.
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
Top Stocks provides analysis about the most noteworthy stocks in the market each day, combining some of the best content from around the MSN Money site and the rest of the Web.
Contributors include professional investors and journalists affiliated with MSN Money.
Follow us on Twitter @topstocksmsn.