Steelmakers seek to revive old pricing system
A return to annual iron-ore contract terms could affect miners' profit margins.
A few years ago, iron-ore miners moved to quarterly pricing from annual contract pricing in order to take advantage of rising prices. However, grappling with slow demand and falling ore prices, steel manufacturers pushed for a spot-pricing method, wherein the prevailing market price for ore is better reflected in the contract price.
However, a shift in contract pricing method would be significantly dependent on Chinese steelmakers as they account for 60% of the world's iron-ore demand. They have not yet explicitly expressed their willingness to change the pricing method.
Spot pricing had hurt the miners as iron-ore prices tumbled in the recent past. Whether a shift in contract pricing method benefits the miners or steel makers will largely depend on the iron ore prices, going forward. While we estimate iron-ore demand to increase, we project the prices to remain subdued for the next few years as additional capacity comes online.
However, better than expected pick-up in steel demand following an eventual economic recovery could boost the iron-ore prices. In that case, the annual contract pricing will hurt the miners as they will seek to lock in the contract prices at lower rates, which will eventually hurt their EBITDA margins. Vale, being the largest iron ore miner in the world, would be most impacted as ferrous minerals (iron ore mainly) constitute nearly 60% of the company's value, by our estimates.
If iron-ore prices remain weak, in line with our expectation, a shift will only benefit the miners as they will receive higher prices for per ton of iron ore in a downward trend.
More from Trefis
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
'We're not exactly in a uniformly strong market,' says the notably pessimistic newsletter publisher.
VIDEO ON MSN MONEY
Contributors include professional investors and journalists affiliated with MSN Money.
Follow us on Twitter @topstocksmsn.